Showing posts with label skepticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label skepticism. Show all posts

Tuesday, 26 May 2009

On love, logic and neurotransmitters

Is it just me, or does love seem to set even usually right-thinking people on the fast track to stupidville? People seem to have the idea that love is something ethereal, something that only poets truly understand. The cultural fallout from this notion is everywhere ('true love', 'love at first sight', etc.).

I must have heard the words 'but it's love, you can't explain it with logic and science' (love is all just hormones and neurotransmitters, people) a million times, and given the requisite explanation a million more. And don't get me started on the girl who told me, after she overheard me talking to someone else, who shares my views on this (they do exist!), 'science takes all the emotion out of everything, it shouldn't be allowed to mess with love', and then, when I tried to explain, 'I don't care about science, it doesn't matter'. When scientists save your life one day, you may think differently.

Can we please, as a society, move on from putting love on a pedestal as this untouchable, pure, poetic thing? It's a remnant of the evolutionary pair-bonding imperative, which exists to maximise the continuation resilience of the species. Nothing more, nothing less. Repeat after me: love is all just hormones and neurotransmitters...

Friday, 8 May 2009

Why would Paris Hilton be safe in a zombie apocalypse?

Answer: They want braiiiinnnns.

And she certainly doesn't have one. London's 'Metro' newspaper has a report detailing how, through legal documents filed as part of a court case, it has come to light just how air-headed the socialite really is.

Apparently she 'gets a new cell phone, like, every two weeks' and has never seen a phone bill in her life. She was a producer for the 2006 flop 'Pledge This!' (and it is this that the whole court case is about, according to the plaintiffs she failed to promote the film effectively), but when asked about this role, she didn't even know what a producer does! 'Help get cool people in the cast', apparently.

My main issue isn't really with morons like Hilton, if they want to stay stupid and aren't interested in the world around them, fine. However, what really annoys me is that they (either actively or passively) encourage young people to follow in their footsteps! 'Oh, I don't care about science or other subjects because I'll just become a socialite instead of getting a job!'. This is mainly girls, although footballers do exactly the same to teenage boys' brains.

I'm sure that when a new medical procedure or chemical (developed by scientists; those who do care) saves their lives or those of their family, they'll be singing a different tune.

Friday, 1 May 2009

Swine flu: fact or pigswill...

Disclaimer: I am not a medical professional, nor do I pretend to be one, and this post is not intended as medical advice. If you show any symptoms of swine flu, be sure to follow the procedures for your country (in most cases this means calling your GP).

The world (well, most of it) is currently embroiled in swine flu madness. The virus has now been reported in 14 countries (4 May 09 update: 20 countries now), is showing an ability to spread amongst humans, and Mexico has "begun a five-day shutdown of... non-essential government services and businesses" in an attempt to control it.

As is to be expected, amongst all the excellent information and advice out there, there is a lot of nonsense and rubbish (I'm looking at you, Daily Sun).
Here are the top three swine flu myths, and the corresponding scientific truths:

Myth: Swine flu is a killer virus, and could kill millions of people (i.e. 1918 Spanish flu)
Reality: Although ~160 people have died in Mexico of swine flu, there have been no deaths in more developed countries (the US death was a Mexican child that had crossed the border). This is mostly due to better healthcare and early treatment. We didn't have anything like Tamiflu (oseltamivir) or Relenza (zanamivir) in 1918, nor did we know as much about transmission methods. It is likely that many people will get sick, but unlikely that many will die, unless they have compromised immune systems (i.e. the elderly, people who are HIV-positive or undergoing intensive cancer treatment).

Myth: You can get the virus from eating pork from infected pigs.
Reality: Err... no, there is no evidence that the flu virus can be passed to humans from pig products as long as the meat is heated to above 70oC (and pork is usually cooked at around 200o). This fear about 'infected pork' is why the WHO refuses to call it 'swine flu' any more, they now use the term 'Influenza A(H1N1)', the 'scientific' name for this strain as it were.

Myth: We should all start wearing face masks to avoid getting the flu.
Reality: Not really. Although the UK Department of Health has ordered crateloads of face masks for doctors and other health workers, these are special masks with especially small holes to trap the tiny virus particles. The regular blue face masks that people have been buying are next to useless, especially when they get moist from your breath. Covering your mouth when coughing and sneezing (preferably with a disposable tissue) is a better way of minimizing the spread of the virus. Face masks also give a false sense of security, and may lead to people not practicing proper hygiene.

Hopefully this has helped clear up some of the 'woo' and sensationalism surrounding swine flu, and remember, ask for the science before accepting anything. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Monday, 27 April 2009

A glimmer of hope...

Television is blamed for an awful lot these days: street violence, bad manners, bad eyesight, bad brains, etc. In some ways this is true, in accordance with Sturgeon's Law, 90% of TV programming is utter crap (Big Brother, [somewhere]'s Got Talent, soaps, any celebrity gossip shows).

However, TV can also be a force for good. There are (at least in the UK, I'm not sure about elsewhere) some truly brilliant science-based, informative shows. Last week I watched one of these, and finally thought 'we're making progress'. In the BBC's 'Professor Regan's Medicine Cabinet', the eponymous Imperial College professor puts various medical myths, from health checks to branded drugs, to the test. The show explains the placebo effect and other important scientific concepts in an easy-to-understand manner, and Regan certainly seems to have her head screwed on air-tight when it comes to scientific rigour (even sending off various homeopathy papers for a thorough statistical analysis).

For someone like me who always follows the science, and doesn't swallow anything (both literally and metaphorically) without seeing the proof, it felt good that proper scientific procedure had come to prime time TV. If at least one person watched the show and stopped using 'complementary' therapies, it did some good.

For those of you in the UK, you can watch the show (and the previous one about diets) on the BBC iPlayer. Those elsewhere with a bit of technical savvy could always google for 'uk proxy' and go from there.

Greetings from Planet Earth!

Ohai! Welcome, wherever or whenever you may be (if you are a time traveller, do remember to visit MIT's Time Travel Convention. I know it's already happened, but then again, you do have a time machine!) . As you may have already picked up, I'm a bit... different from your average Homo sapiens. I love science (specifically physics), and am proud to call myself a geek and a skeptic. For this reason, I am increasingly disturbed by the amount of woo-woo and very bad science floating around today. Here I will output my thoughts and opinions on various things, from skepticism and science to computers, and anything else in between which I find interesting!